In-beam gamma-spectroscopy with relativistic radioactive ion beams (RIB) is a rather untouched field which offers new opportunities to study the nuclear structure of exotic nuclei: Coulomb excitation and few nucleon removal reactions provide rich spectroscopic information; thick secondary targets can be used resulting in large yields counteracting low beam intensities. On the other hand, one has to cope with large Doppler effects and huge atomic background. The aim of our studies was to investigate the feasibility of this new experimental method for the study of the nuclear structure of the neutron-rich nuclei below 48Ca with neutron number between the two magic numbers N=20 and N=28.
More detailed information about these investigations are available on this site,
which are extracts of the
In the N=28 chain theory also predicts strong deformations
for the very neutron-rich nuclei like 44S [6].
There is indeed experimental evidence for a rapid weakening of shell effect
below 48Ca from the beta-decay of very neutron-rich nuclei 43P, 42,44,45S,
44-46Cl and 47Ar [7]. But this evidence is rather indirect.
For a long time, the experimental data in the N=20-28, Z<20 region were very rare,
especially the B(E2) values were missing (see fig.1) because
these exotic nuclei cannot be produced with useful yields from
fusion-evaporation or transfer reactions employing stable beams and targets
and it was difficult to produce radioactive ion beams (RIBs) of them.
Therefore, it was necessary as well as challenging to perform
Coulomb excitation experiment with RIBs to study this region systematically.
Two experimental particularities are related to the high beam energy.
An average Doppler broadening of 15% is expected for in-beam gamma-spectra detected by
a common gamma-detector with an opening angle of 18 degrees (fig.2);
the cross section of atomic background is at least
three orders of magnitude larger than typical Coulomb excitation cross sections (fig.3).
The Darmstadt-Heidelberg Crystal Ball (CB)
consisting of 162 individual NaI crystals with
an intrinsic energy resolution of 8% is therefore well suited;
moreover, its 4pi solid angle and large full energy efficiency
(70% at 1.3 MeV) compensate for the low beam intensity.
To suppress atomic background, a 2 mm thick Pb tube was installed between the CB and the secondary target
which was placed at the center of the CB, and a threshold of 500 keV was set to the CB trigger.
In addition, the scattering angle theta was measured in order to suppress those events
being composed of only atomic background and distributing at theta around 0 degree.
Another goal to measure theta is to try to distinguish Coulomb and nuclear excitation which dominate
at different impact parameter regions.
In order to measure the neutrons evaporated from giant resonances which is expected to be populated in
relativistic Coulomb excitation, the neutron detector LAND was employed.
The scattering angle theta was determined with an efficiency of 30%.
With an intrinsic resolution of 5 mrad and the atomic angular straggling of 6 and 2 mrad
for the Pb and C target, the combined resolution was not sufficient to distinguish Coulomb
and nuclear excitation but helpful to suppress atomic background in the gamma-spectra.
Requiring the gamma-trigger, gamma-multiplicity M=1, and/or A2=A1,
a gamma-peak around 1473 MeV corresponding to the first excited state in 28Mg was observed
from the inelastic excitation of 28Mg impinging on the Pb and C target.
Similarly, another gamma-peak around 1700 keV composed of two transitions of the low-lying states
in 27Mg was observed.
Cross sections for these peaks were
comparable with coupled-channels calculations where both the Coulomb and nuclear interactions are
included (fig.7, tab.1).
The cross sections from excitations with Pb were 5 to 10 times larger than with C where
nuclear excitation is dominant.
This shows that the major contribution to the inelastic excitation in Pb is Coulomb excitation.
As to nucleon removal reactions, from the 43Ar+Pb -> 42Ar+1n and
43Ar+C -> 42Ar+1n channels, a gamma-peak around 1200 keV was observed
with M=2-4 (Pb) and M=1-4 (C).
By investigating the sum energy and gamma-gamma-coincidence matrix,
this peak was confirmed to be associated with a gamma-cascade
in 42Ar, demonstrating the high selectivity and sensitivity of the method (fig.9).
Moreover, from the two and three neutron removal reactions of 43Ar with the C target,
gamma-peaks associated with higher-lying states of 41Ar and 40Ar were observed (fig.10).
Cross sections of secondary fragmentation reactions of 28Mg and 43Ar with the C target
were derived experimentally. They were comparable but not completely consistent with
empirical calculations (fig.11, fig.12).
The experimental data deduced from this experiment enable to modify the parametrization for a new
systematics for masses of 20-45 and energies of 200-300 MeV.
[1] G. Huber, F. Touchard et al., Phys. Rev. C 18 (1978) 2342.

Fig.1:
The knowledge of the even-even stable and neutron-rich nuclei in the N=20-28, Z<20 region
till late 1995. The magic and semi-magic nuclei are marked by lines.
2. Experiment
The experiment was performed in late 1995 at GSI by the
CB-
LAND-
FRS-Collaboration from GSI,
Darmstadt and
MPI-K,
Heidelberg.
After the fragmentation reaction of 50Ti on 9Be at 330 AMeV,
about 50 nuclear species (in which more than 30 were beta-unstable neutron-rich isotopes)
with Z = 4-20, A/Z around 2.1-2.5 and
energies in the range of 210-280 AMeV (v/c about 0.58-0.64) were selected simultaneously by
the FRagment Separator FRS at GSI, Darmstadt.
This secondary RIB which was transferred to the target area had
an intensity of around 10^4 pps (particles per second) for the full composition of nuclear
species i.e. on the average about 200 pps for each nuclear species.
Secondary peripheral reactions of the RIB with a 0.94 g/cm^2 Pb and a 0.54 g/cm^2 C target
were employed to populate the excited states.
The mass number A1 of each nuclear species in the RIB was identified by time of flight;
A2 after the secondary reactions was obtained by the dE-Brho-TOF method employing the dipole
magnet ALADIN;
the charge numbers Z1 and Z2 were determined by two dE counters. 
Fig.2:
(a) Doppler shift,
(b) Doppler broadening assuming an opening angle of 18 degrees for one detector element
(the 7% intrinsic energy resolution of the CB is marked by the dashed line),
(c) angular distribution of gamma-rays in the rest system and
(d) in the lab system (after the Lorentz transformation).
The angular distribution of gamma-rays in the lab system is peaked at forward
angles where Doppler broadening is rather severe.

Fig.3:
Angle-integrated cross section of the atomic background from
43Ar on the Pb (solid line) and C target (dashed line) at 222 AMeV. The 500 keV detection
threshold of the NaIs of the CB used in the experiment is marked.

Fig.4: The experimental set-up in the target area Cave B
(another scheme
where detector positions are indicated is also available). 3. Analysis
Z1 and Z2 were measured with a resolution of 0.5 mass units and an efficiency of nearly 100%,
while A1 was measured with a resolution 0.3 to 0.6 mass units (better for lighter isotopes) and
an efficiency of 80%.
The resolution of A2 for heavy nuclei like Ar was 0.8 mass units with an efficiency of 30%;
for light nuclei like Mg, A2 could be derived by the standard mode with 0.8 mass units resolution
and 55% efficiency and another mode with a better resolution of 0.6 mass units but only 10%
efficiency. See fig.5 and fig.6. 
Fig.5:
The charge and mass distribution of the RIBs
produced from the fragmentation of the 330 AMeV 50Ti primary beam on a 4 g/cm^2 9Be
primary target with FRS setting optimized to 38S.
The borderline between stable and neutron-rich
nuclei is marked. On the top-left the Z1 distribution is shown;
on the bottom-right, as examples, the A1 distributions of Mg and Ar are shown.

Fig.6:
The charge and mass distribution behind the Pb (left) and C (right) target requiring
incoming 28Mg.
The top panels show the Z2 charge distributions.
The middle and bottom panels display the A2 mass distributions derived by different modes
requiring Z2 = 12.
There is contribution from atomic background in the Z2=Z1 and A2=A1 peak
because no condition on the CB is required.
4. Results
By setting cuts on Z1 and A1, in-beam gamma-spectroscopy of more than 30 nuclear species in
the RIB could be performed.
The weakest channels like 42Ar where discrete gamma-lines were identified had an intensity of only
80 particles per second in the RIB.
The incoming Mg- and Ar-isotopes representing light and
heavy nuclei respectively, were discussed in detail as examples.
Z2 = Z1 was required to limit the reactions to inelastic excitation and neutron removal
reaction channels. 
Fig.7:
Gamma-spectra for four reactions, corrected with the CB efficiency.
Peaks and backgrounds are fitted with solid and dashed lines.
The gamma-peak at 1700 keV is fitted with two Gauss peaks because
it is interpreted as a mixture of two transitions 5/2+(1940),5/2+(1698) -> 1/2+(0) in 27Mg.

Tab.1:
Cross sections for excitation of state |m>
obtained by coupled-channels calculations using CCNUC and derived from experimental data.

Fig.9:
Gating on A2=42, the peak around 1200 keV observed in both
43Ar+Pb -> 42Ar+1n and 43Ar+C -> 42Ar+1n reactions
can be proven to be composed of two gamma-lines from the gamma-cascade
2+(2487) -> 2+(1208) -> 0+(0) of 42Ar.
(top): The sum energy concentrates at 1200 keV with M=1 and 2400 keV with M=2.
(middle): The gamma-gamma-coincidence matrix peaks at E1=E2=1200 keV.
(bottom): The projection on the E2 axis with a gate around E1=1200 keV
shows a clean peak at E2=1200 keV.

Fig.10:
Gamma-spectra from two and three neutron removal reaction channels obtained by gating on A2.
top: From the 43Ar+C -> 41Ar reaction channel, with M=2-3,
three peaks show up (left), which are interpreted as gamma-transitions from 41Ar (right).
bottom: From the 43Ar+C -> 40Ar reaction channel, gating on M=1-3,
three peaks related to transitions in 40Ar can be seen.

Fig.11:
Fragment production after the reaction of 28Mg (left) and 43Ar (right) with the C target.
The A2 resolution of the 28Mg and 43Ar beam which is obtained from the top spectra
respectively as 0.6 and 0.8 mass units, is used to fit the fragment distribution.

Fig.12:
Isotopic cross section evaluated from experimental data and calculated with EPAX.
5. Summary
Employing secondary RIB to study exotic nuclei
is attracting more and more attention.
The work at RIKEN[5] and MSU[8]
showed that, Coulomb excitation using intermediate-energy beams
is a successful way to study the first excited state of exotic light neutron-rich nuclei.
Our pilot experiment
--despite the low beam intensity and short beam time--
demonstrates, on the other hand,
that in-beam gamma-spectroscopy with RIB at relativistic energies is feasible too.
With heavy targets like Pb, single step inelastic excitation originating mainly from
Coulomb interaction takes place so that first excited state can be investigated
and B(E2) values can be extracted;
with light targets like C, moreover, secondary nuclear reactions are strong and
excited states with higher energy and/or spin can be populated thus offering
richer spectroscopic information in this region.
[2] D. Guillemaud et al., Nucl. Phys. A 426 (1984) 37.
[3] B. H. Wildentahal, M. S. Curtin and B. A.Brown, Phys. Rev. C 28 (1983) 1343.
[4] N. Fukunishi, T. Otsuka and T. Sebe, Phys. Lett. B 296 (1992) 279.
[5] T. Motobayashi, Y. Ikeda et al., Phys. Lett. B 346 (1995) 9.
[6] T. R. Werner et al., Phys. Lett. B 333 (1994) 303.
[7] O. Sorlin, D. Guillemaud-Mueller et al., Nucl. Phys. A 583 (1995) 763.
[8] T. Glasmacher et al., Phys. Lett. B 395 (1997) 163.